October 27, 2022
There are three prevailing themes on The COVID Blog™ in all monthly archives. Nearly all post-injection deaths result from blood clot complications, i.e. cardiac arrest, ruptured brain aneurysms, heart attacks, etc. These victims spontaneously drop dead, with very little chance of being saved, even with all the necessary medical equipment (e.g. defibrillators) present. Post-injection, hyper-aggressive cancers are the second-most common underlying causes of death for vaxxed people after blood clots.
The second prevailing theme herein is the very reasonable, highly-justified distrust of doctors and the overall medical establishment. There are plenty of valid reasons for this. But primarily, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Centers for Disease Control (CDC), the agencies in charge of American medicine, are led by a revolving door of big Pharma executives and hospital bureaucrats.
Here are all the CDC directors since the turn of the millennium.
- Julie L. Gerberding – CDC Director (2002 to 2009). Merck executive from 2010 to 2021, and now works for the National Institutes of Health.
- Tom Frieden – CDC Director (2009 to 2017). Became CEO of Resolve to Save Lives in 2017. The organization’s mission is to “prevent deadly epidemics in low- and middle-income countries.” It is funded by Bill Gates and Mark Zuckerberg.
- Brenda Fitzgerald – CDC Director (2017-2018). Forced to resign less than six month after being appointed due to far too many big Pharma conflicts of interests, including buying and selling tobacco stocks while in office.
- Robert R. Redfield – CDC Director (2018-2021). Scammed $20 million from U.S. taxpayers to create a fake AIDS “vaccine.”
- Rochelle Walensky – CDC Director (2021 to present). Just get your third booster and believe she’s not reading a script, and you’ll love her.
We won’t go through all the FDA directors. But Mark McClellan, FDA Director from 2002 to 2004, became Chairman of the Board for the Reagan-Udall Foundation in 2007. It is the FDA equivalent to the CDC Foundation, a government-created “nonprofit” that allows big Pharma to funnel and redirect billions of dollars under the guise of charity.
RELATED: CDC Foundation is not a government entity, has many conflicts of interest (March 23, 2021)
We’ve already covered Stephen Hahn (FDA Director 2019 to 2021), who represents perhaps the most egregious example in history of criminal racketeering between U.S. government medical agencies and big Pharma.
U.S. doctors would rather you die than perform a life-saving heart, kidney or other transplant if you are non-vaccinated. They are paid $13,000 for diagnosing you with so-called COVID-19, receive $40 for every mRNA injection they give you, and get $39,000 bonuses for placing you on a ventilator. U.S. doctors know the lethal injections are poisonous. Yet they encourage you to take them, and receive the shot themselves, resulting in thousands of doctors dropping like flies.
RELATED: Ontario healthcare workers pester government into allowing fourth injections for all adults, then four doctors, three at same hospital system, die suddenly of #ABV (July 28, 2022)
You literally must be a next-level fool to trust the U.S. medical industrial complex.
The third prevailing theme is personality changes in vaxxed people. Granted we haven’t covered many of these stories since a flood of them in mid-to-late 2021. But many vaxxed people’s personalities clearly change after being injected. Many become vile, virtue-signaling vaxx zealots on social media. But others become recluses, knowing that there is something wrong with their bodies after receiving the shots. Buyers remorse is not an option. Thus many of these individuals commit suicide.
RELATED: Kailia Posey: 16-year-old beauty pageant winner and reality TV star dead, authorities say suicide (May 6, 2022)
The global medical/pharmaceutical industrial complex is worth an estimated $12 trillion in 2022. That includes pharmaceuticals, hospitals, insurance and cosmetics. Broken down separately, four of the top six industries in the U.S. are related to “healthcare.” The United States accounts for one-third, or $4.1 trillion, of the global medical industrial complex, according to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. To put that in perspective, global military spending is “only” $2 trillion per year, with the U.S. accounting for a little over one-third of that as well.
At least 70% of Americans take one prescription drug per day, according to the Mayo Clinic. Half take at least two prescription drugs per day, while one-quarter of Americans take five or more daily prescription drugs. These data are from 2013. It’s safe to conclude that the numbers have increased. Prescription-savings app SingleCare reported earlier this month that five of the top 10 drugs that experienced significant fill increases in 2022 were anxiety and antidepressant drugs.
Meanwhile cancer rates are at all-time highs in the U.S. in 2022. But you wouldn’t know that if you rely on the CDC for said data. More on that in a bit.
Let’s talk about cancer, propaganda and deaths
CNN published a propaganda article last week entitled “A global epidemic of cancer among people younger than 50 could be emerging.” It begins by telling the story of Mrs. Iana dos Reis Nunes. She was only 46 years old when she died of colon cancer…in September 2019. CNN’s goal was to find one of those very rare cases of a young[er] person dying of cancer prior to the lethal injection rollout in 2021 to make it appear to be some longitudinal trend.
They could have easily used the story of Ms. Amber Stephanie Takesh to drive home this point.
Not only was Ms. Takesh half the age (24) of Mrs. Reis Nunes, but she just died from a rare form of hyper-aggressive leukemia on October 6. That’s called “timeliness” in journalism. Ms. Takesh wrote in a blog post one week before her death:
“One day I’m a normal 22-year-old girl, living and working in a new city. You hear awful things, you see crazy storylines on TV and in the movies, and you never imagine these bad things could ever happen to you. As humans, we take our health for granted until you realize how valuable it really is. In March of 2021, I was diagnosed with Acute Myeloid Leukemia…”
It isn’t crystal clear whether or not Ms. Takesh received the injections. But she started working at global accounting firm KPMG sometime in late 2020 or early 2021. She was working in their Arlington, Virginia office before being diagnosed with leukemia, according to her online obituary.
KPMG has had a vaccine coercion policy in place since the beginning of 2021, before implementing its full mandate in October 2021. Ms. Takesh graduated from James Madison University in May 2020. KPMG was her first “real job” as an accountant. Odds are she received the shots, particularly since 24-year-olds don’t just suddenly get blood cancer and die.
This is not to say that the death of Mrs. Reis Nunes isn’t important. But the CNN propaganda piece deliberately used a young cancer death from three years ago instead of a very-young cancer death that happened 11 days before publishing their article. It was purely for deflection and distraction. The underlying premise of the article, however, is real.
RELATED: Truth Bombshell: 9 peer-reviewed studies conclude that Ivermectin is a powerful, highly-effective anti-cancer drug (April 11, 2022)
This blogger did not and does not need statistics and studies to know that cancer diagnoses and deaths are way higher in 2022 than at any other point since he’s been alive. There is an entire Post-Injection Cancer category here on The COVID Blog™. Two chapters of the forthcoming The COVID Blog™ book are dedicated to post-injection, hyper-aggressive cancers. But more data are emerging, backing up the obvious trends and coverups.
The Ethical Skeptic (“TES”) is a popular, anonymous website ran by a U.S. Naval Intelligence Officer. Their corresponding Twitter account has over 165,000 followers as of publishing. TES is known for publishing intricate datasets, disseminated in the form of charts and graphs. This blogger wrote his first article about the con of “coronavirus” in March 2020. TES was discovered shortly thereafter, as they were one of the few who also saw right through CON-vid from the beginning. Now TES has published one of their most important datasets to date.
At least 20% of deaths classified as so-called COVID-19 since April 2021 were/are actually cancer deaths, according to a series of charts published by TES. The CDC has been artificially manipulating (hiding) cancer death stats by switching the underlying cause of death (UCoD) to “COVID,” while listing cancer as an MCoD (multiple cause of death) on death certificates. The good Dr. Joseph Mercola not only co-signed this analysis, but added that tumor sizes since 2021 “have become dramatically larger.”
RELATED: Peer-reviewed manuscript concludes that CDC massively inflates COVID-19 case and death numbers with creative statistics (February 12, 2021)
Our very first post-injection cancer story/death was Ms. Jovita Moore, who received her first Pfizer mRNA injection on April 2, 2021 – when the CDC started cooking the cancer stat book. Ms. Moore died from hyper-aggressive brain cancer a little over six months later. Out of 21 potential or otherwise post-injection cancer cases we’ve covered on this blog (including two in this article), 15 are dead. These hyper-aggressive, mRNA-induced cancers kill and kill fast.
Interestingly we’ve not seen even one post-injection, hyper-aggressive breast cancer case, which is a bit ironic.
Mammograms plus DCIS equal fear and big bucks
Ms. Brandy Raithel was a 44-year-old wife and mother of four children. She resided in Peoria, Illinois.
The circumstances surrounding her September 12 death are not crystal clear. But Ms. Ally Raithel, Brandy’s daughter, wrote on the day of her mother’s death that Brandy “is no longer in pain.” Two days later, Ally wrote that her mom was “a breast cancer survivor.”
Again, we don’t know if Ms. Raithel died of reactivated breast cancer. But what we do know is that anyone who has had any form of true cancer in the past, and receives the mRNA or viral vector DNA injections (which Dr. Judy Mikovits called “cancer envelopes“), is jeopardizing their life.
Breast cancer is by far the most commonly-diagnosed “normal” cancer of them all. Upwards of 25% of those diagnoses are ductal carcinoma in situ, or DCIS, according to the Cleveland Clinic. DCIS is non-invasive, abnormal-looking cells contained inside the milk ducts. The Cleveland Clinic admits that DCIS “doesn’t typically metastasize, or spread to other organs in your body, as aggressive or invasive cancers do.” DCIS is the fifth most-common cancer diagnosis in women. And believe it or not, this “cancer,” for all intents and purposes, did not exist prior to the late 1980s.
History of mammograms and DCIS
Mammograms have been available for mainstream medical use since the 1960s. But the American Cancer Society did not start recommending them until 1976 – and that was only for women over age 50 unless there was a history of cancer in the family. Regardless, few women used mammograms. They were expensive and, frankly, unnecessary. This blogger remembers all the breast “self-exam” PSA’s on TV as a child, along with seeing his own mother and friends’ mothers doing self-exams on themselves. Basically if you felt a lump, there MIGHT be something wrong – emphasis on might.
First Lady Nancy Reagan received a mammogram in 1987. It found “intraductal adenocarcinoma,” which today is known as ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). She felt no symptoms, no pain, and no lump from a self-exam. Thus if she had foregone the mammogram, she wouldn’t have even known about the alleged DCIS. But the word “cancer” frightens most people, particularly women, like no other. Mrs. Reagan underwent a mastectomy in October 1987. This event changed American women forever.
Mammograms started being advertised all over television and radio. By 1990, two-thirds of American women ages 40 and up had a mammogram at some point, according to CDC data. Nearly 75% of white “educated” women over 40 received mammograms. Many women quickly underwent mastectomies (plus radiation and chemical castration, aka hormone therapy, for some) if even one tiny “cancer cell” was found.
They did so because Mrs. Reagan did it. They did/do it despite feeling no pain, no symptoms and no lump. A 1998 study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) essentially referred to this phenomenon as the “Nancy Reagan effect.” The scam has grown from there.
DCIS is only “cancer” in the United States
If you do a non-Google search of DCIS online, you will find that in most countries outside the U.S., it is referred to as “stage zero cancer” or not cancer at all. It is not life-threatening. The main problem with DCIS is over-diagnosis and over-treatment. U.S. doctors use the words “breast cancer,” scare women to death, and place said women at the mercy of mastectomies, radiation and chemical castrations despite a lot of DCIS being clinically irrelevant.
A 2017 cohort study published in the journal Annals of Internal Medicine found that 48% of women who received regular mammograms were over-diagnosed with DCIS or some other breast cancer. Over-diagnosis means the “cancer” that was found would have likely stopped growing or went away completely on its own without treatment. But just like doctors who tell truth about the mRNA and viral vector DNA injections; doctors who tell truth about the DCIS racket risk their professional livelihoods.
Dr. Apar Gupta, of Columbia University, said as recently as 2021 that the current standard of care for DCIS is to treat it like invasive cancer, when DCIS is non-invasive. He also pointed out that the 10-year survival rate for DCIS patients is 98% whether they receive the “treatments” or forego them all. Dr. Diana Zuckerman called traditional DCIS mastectomies and radiation “unnecessary radical surgery and treatment.” Dr. Shelley Hwang, formerly of the University of California San Francisco, summed up DCIS this way:
“I think it’s really important to emphasize that none of this will go forward until physicians and patients are comfortable with the idea that treating DCIS is a way to prevent progression, rather than that DCIS is a disease that needs to be cured.”
Like what you’re reading? Help keep us up and running. Please donate via Bitcoin, Ethereum, Stellar, credit/debit card, CashApp, Zelle, and/or eCheck.
DCIS is simply a warning to women, telling them that their current lifestyles are not healthy. There are so many stories of women diagnosed with Stage 2 and higher breast cancer who skipped all the life-altering “treatments,” changed their diets and lifestyles, and the cancer went away or stopped growing. The good Dr. Mattias Rath details how humans can simply eliminate certain things from their diets and lifestyles, while adding specific micronutrients to ensure healthy cells throughout the body.
Bottom line is that there is no financial benefit for doctors telling women with DCIS to change their lifestyles. A $50,000 double mastectomy, $10,000 for radiation, and another few thousand for chemical castration drugs are much more lucrative.
And what about depression and psychology?
This blogger would have been diagnosed with a mental disorder called “drapetomania” in the 1850s. This disease, first published in the New Orleans Medical and Surgical Journal in 1851, was diagnosed in enslaved Black people who escaped, rebelled or questioned their status in any way, shape or form. In other words, American psychology said that you were sick and mentally deranged if you did not love being a slave. This blogger has regarded psychology as pseudoscience since learning about drapetomania in the mid-2000s.
Today, mainstream media glorify “mental health therapy” as some honorable, noble thing for all people to do. But this is not Sigmund Freud’s psychology, when patients laid on a couch and spilled their guts, so the doctor could determine the root cause of a psychological issue. Nowadays you step into an office or a teleconference, tell someone you feel bad, and five minutes later, you receive a prescription for some sort of drug you take everyday in perpetuity.
One in four U.S. adults has some sort of “diagnosable mental disorder,” according to Johns Hopkins University. Depression is one of the top 2 or 3 most-commonly diagnosed conditions. The treatment is always selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) drugs – Prozac, Lexapro, Celexa, Zoloft, etc. The SSRI industry is a global giant, worth over $15 billion per year. But now there’s evidence that the established theories behind depression, serotonin, and the foregoing drugs are all wrong, and the medical establishment has known this for some time.
Researchers at University College London published a meta-analysis of 17 studies on the effectiveness of SSRIs as depression medicine in July 2022. They found no evidence tying low serotonin levels to depression. Lead author Joanna Moncrieff said:
“It is always difficult to prove a negative, but I think we can safely say that after a vast amount of research conducted over several decades, there is no convincing evidence that depression is caused by serotonin abnormalities, particularly by lower levels or reduced activity of serotonin. Many people take antidepressants because they have been led to believe their depression has a biochemical cause, but this new research suggests this belief is not grounded in evidence.”
The researchers also found that artificially lowering serotonin levels in the human brain did not lead to depression. “We do not understand what (SSRIs) are doing to the brain exactly,” Professor Moncrieff said.
Now is a good time for all people taking these drugs to stop. Granted, like all powerful drugs, there will be withdrawal symptoms; and you may want to get off said drugs under supervision. Ambitious patients could even try suing the drug manufacturers for fraud. But that’s a conversation for another day.
Divest entirely of the global medical racket
This blogger has said it before – mainstream media and the medical industry need “studies” to show that water is wet and fire is hot. But critical thinkers, particularly journalists with their own growing data sets, can draw conclusions based on real-life observations.
Remember Mr. Jordan Hayes? He’s the 33-year-old New Yorker who died on July 6, 2021, 14 weeks after his second mRNA injection. There was no sign of him on social media being an obnoxious zealot of any kind prior to the shots. But after the injections, he started attacking the non-vaccinated at every opportunity, calling them “idiots,” “morons,” and other stuff. Mr. Willie Garson, Mr. Brent Henley, Dr. Sohrab Lutchmedial, and many others are examples of this phenomenon. Seemingly decent, normal people turned into nasty monsters after the shots. Now mainstream science is chiming in.
A study of 7,109 Americans published last month on the peer-reviewed journal PLOS One analyzed their personality traits from 2014 to 2022. Researchers found “significant changes” in personality traits “when comparing pre-pandemic survey responses to those given between January 2021 and February 2022.” Agreeableness, extraversion, conscientiousness, and openness all decreased significantly after 2021, when the “vaccines” were rolled out. Again, studies are unnecessary when you’re guided by facts and critical thinking.
If you received the injections and previously had some sort of cancer, now is a good time to update your will and cross off bucket list items. Same goes for 70% of vaxxed people diagnosed with some out-of-the-blue hyper-aggressive cancer. For non-vaccinated people, particularly women diagnosed with DCIS, please heed everything in this article, and exercise discernment. For those of you still taking antidepressants after reading this, God help you.
More unnecessary studies and analyses have been done on chemotherapy. They concluded the obvious: chemotherapy will kill you faster than any cancer. There are also reports that 75% of doctors worldwide refuse chemotherapy for themselves.
Western humanity and cancer “treatments” (and mRNA injections and SSRIs) remind this blogger of those flying insect zappers. Bugs are excused for being too stupid to discern their imminent deaths once they land on the bright light. But Western humans are supposed to be “the most intelligent animals” in this world. Yet many believe that sitting in a diet Chernobyl machine several times per week, and/or injecting mustard gas agents (“chemotherapy“) into their veins, will somehow improve their health. It’s the same with the experimental mRNA and viral vector DNA injections, and SSRIs.
Western humans simply are not very smart. The global vaccine genocide was only made possible because of this phenomenon. But at least the non-vaccinated get a front-row seat to the most surreal times in human history. Stay vigilant and protect your friends and loved ones.
COVID Legal USA is your partner in fight mandatory vaccines and other COVID mandates. Follow us on Telegram. Pre-order The COVID Blog™ book here. Shipping starts on December 15, 2022.
Fight back against censorship! We are once again processing credit card donations. CLICK HERE TO DONATE VIA CREDIT OR DEBIT CARD.
You may also donate via CashApp, Zelle, eCheck, Bitcoin, Ethereum, Stellar, and/or snail mail.