August 3, 2021
“Three things cannot be long hidden: the sun, the moon and the truth.” Nobody knows the exact origin of that quote. But essentially it means that all three entities shine for anyone to see at any time.
Bill Gates desires to both block sunlight from reaching Earth and block the truth from reaching the masses. The truth, however, is coming to light from the most unexpected sources – the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the pharmaceutical industry.
Fauci mea culpas and flip flips continue
Anthony Fauci appeared on the CBS Sunday morning show “Face the Nation” two days ago. He once again spoke out of both sides of his mouth as his fans and mainstream media facilitators eat it up.
Fauci said that Delta variant cases in vaccinated people (“breakthrough cases”) have the same level of virus as unvaccinated Delta cases. He also admitted that “vaccinated people who get breakthrough infections can spread the virus to other people.” In other words, these so-called vaccines do not work as advertised.
Three weeks ago, Fauci said “the data are as good as it gets” as it related to the experimental mRNA and viral vector DNA injections. He said Pfizer, Moderna and J&J should and will all get full approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) because, “the efficacy or the effectiveness in the real world is unquestioned.” He continued, “These vaccines are highly, highly effective both in the clinical trial and in the real-world effectiveness studies.”
Meanwhile the CDC released a study on July 30. It found that 74% of new COVID-19 cases in Barnstable County, Massachusetts from July 3 to 17 were fully vaccinated. Thus the CDC admits that these injections do not work as advertised. The agency encouraged all people, vaxxed or otherwise, to wear masks.
Pfizer admits its mRNA shots do not work as advertised
There’s no end to the levels of lunacy in this entire COVID-19 agenda. The official Pfizer Twitter account posted on July 28 about its clinical trials for oral anti-viral treatments that work “alongside vaccines.” The company wrote, “the need for anti-viral treatment is growing” because COVID-19 keeps spreading around the world.
Pfizer admitted two things here. First, their mRNA injections do not stop the spread of COVID-19. Second, Pfizer is essentially going to rebrand Ivermectin and/or hydroxychloroquine, and sell the products for $100+ per dose. Despite admitting the mRNA injections do not work, Pfizer is seeking emergency use authorization for its third “booster shots.”
Data from Israel found that the Pfizer mRNA injections were only 39% effective at preventing COVID-19 infections in June and July. So their solution is to give booster shots to people over age 60.
CDC admits PCR tests do not work
Just when you thought things couldn’t get crazier. We wrote back in April how COVID-19 is the greatest rebranding campaign in history. The CDC not only started referring to influenza as the more sinister “COVID-19,” but also changed tabulation rules to create even more cases. Several people emailed us, calling The COVID Blog a “conspiracy website” after we published the article. The CDC must be a conspiracy website as well then.
A July 21 CDC bulletin said that the organization is withdrawing its emergency use authorization for PCR testing (original link here) effective December 31, 2021. Here is the best part of the bulletin:
CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses.
Thus the PCR tests that have been used since February 2020 cannot tell the difference between the novel coronavirus and influenza. Of course that is because the flu and COVID are the same thing. But we cannot expect the CDC to take this admission that far.
Disinformation is the new normal
At this point, only those who wish to be controlled are listening to Fauci and mainstream media. The concept of caveat emptor is also in play. Millions of people allowed someone to inject experimental mRNA or viral vector DNA into their bodies. The responsibility rested on the individuals to research and vet the product before committing to it. Just like you cannot return a car sold “as is,” you cannot reverse the experimental injections. Thus you must defend your decision and the product, until death do you part.
Make certain to keep sharing The COVID Blog via email lists and verbally. We cannot save the world. But we can live and lead by example. Stay vigilant and protect your friends and loved ones.
Contact COVID Legal USA today if you are fighting against mandatory vaccines for employment. We also assist people with pro se representation related to other COVID mandates and restrictions. Follow us on Telegram.
“Caveat emptor” (buyer beware) indeed! I even heard Dr. Ben Carson over the weekend spout some nonsense about equating death (or adverse effects, can’t remember) from the experiment with being struck by lightning! I just can’t believe this guy isn’t familiar with VAERS OR EudraVigilance.
Even though this article and other sites are showing the ineffectiveness of these experiments with respect to the variants, the establishment keeps pushing the narrative.
And why aren’t people talking about absolute vs relative risk reduction of these experiments (0.4-7% vs ~95% “effective)? Who wants less than a 1% benefit for this experiment?! Just like 911, into the memory black hole for many.
People have been dumbed down to this level. Once it was known that they would eat Tide pods without thinking the oligarchs knew it was time for the Great Reset.
“You are 100% conspiracy theorists! You dastardly people. How dare you quote government sites! I only believe the head I do not know nor will ever meet speaking on a box. That head rules my life and I will obey it until I die! I do not care about your so called truths no matter how factual they are. I am indoctrinated and proud of it. You can’t push me around with logic and common sense because they are just trickery. No-one uses their brain. Why can’t you just accept that? I read 1984 at school and thought it was a joke. How could that ever happen? Impossible. You are just like flat earthers. I wear my NASA/NSA T-shirt proudly and know without any shadow of doubt that Fauci is a saint. Hell, he should be knighted and given sainthood. He has saved numerous lives but you just keep quoting his mistakes. You know he is under pressure with all this Corona flying everywhere. Oh you anti vaxxers will be locked up without a key soon. I have been told on special authority that FEMA has a very special plan for you! Enjoy.” – Quote from everyone around me 24/7.
Haha, good rant Tex! We just got 1984 from the library, I haven’t read it in ages and my wife never has. I’m surprised they haven’t banned it yet; after all, they have to make room for their 170+ copies of White Fragility (not kidding).
*CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses*
So we are told the vaccine stops the spread then told they don’t.
This level of doublethink is proof this is all a scam.
“The responsibility rested on the individuals to research and vet the product before committing to it.”
Sadly many Have not done this…. Most of man on this planet KNOWS TOO MUCH to listen to GOD (inner voice) for advice and man knows to much to listen to the humble man for advice…. The pro injection push and propaganda reminds me of the sinking of the Titantic ship … UNSINKABLE they they arrogantly called the Titantic before it sailed off…. Shortly after it sank and many died…. Just like those who arrogantly said these injections will save lives…. The injections have maimed people and many have died… when history is NOT learned we are doomed to repeat it! The humble man or woman learns from it and lives wisely the man or woman that knows too much doesn’t…. Kudos to the editor of this blog… I respect your dedication and thorough research validating the articles you write while at the same time being respectful to those hurt and passed on due to this kill game waged by the cabal at this time…. Gods speed to you
Cada vez más vacunas letales cuando existen productos excelentes para prevenir y tratar el covid como el dióxido de cloro que increíblemente está prohibido.
What is the (Poison Crown) in Latin if you don’t already know? (Venenum Coronatus). I’m not making this up! I found this out from others who are skilled in Latin.
This is another really well written article, however I have a different outlook as pertains to the PCR testing emergency use revocation, that assesses this matter from the viewpoint of the reptile-brained munchkin and his accomplishes running this show –
I think that you need to consider this from a two-pronged baseline – the Fauci-ites essentially need two things –
1) They need a continued ‘battle royale’ distraction in which the general population is whipped to frenzy over vaccination status and encouraged to fight one another into exhaustion, without which, the focus would return to Fauci / Daszak et al, and the roles that they had in relation to Viral development.
2) They need ‘vaccine’ mandates to propagate in private industry and academia, for multiple reasons – A) including, the above mentioned conflict that deflects attention from their own actions, B) wiping out the pool of unvaccinated / naturally immune for outcome comparisons once the ‘booster shots’ start being mandated for the experimental test subjects, C) long-term negative outcomes cannot be traced back to experimental injections since everyone will have had at least one shot, and D) the naturally immune are all rolled into the pool of artificial injectees, to offer a false appearance of efficacy and immunity for the S.P. vax.
The legal hand that the Fauci-ites are holding is actually a lot weaker than it is being sold in mass media, and when deceptive fraudsters are holding a bad hand, they can be relied on to attempt to bluff their way out of it because the norm for these sort is to assume that everyone else is a dupe or mark who can be ‘rolled’.
I was reading up on the Indiana U anti-mandate suit going to the Supreme Court, and while I hope that it prevails as is, it appears from media descriptions to only argue a religious exemption case, which is actually NOT the strongest argument.
The strongest argument would be to include a plaintiff who is recovered from Covid and has lab testing to prove current immunity, along with the religious exemption argument..
My personal example – I have full immunity from the Hep B virus, and when I have worked in certain jobs, the hiring process always required that you FIRST be medically tested for existing Hep B immunity. If the blood test shows that you do not have Hep B immunity, you must then take the Hep B vaccine to be eligible for employment, as required for certain LE, Fire Dept, EMT or other Medical jobs. I am NOT required to take the Hep B vaccine, because I already demonstrate immunity in a blood test for the virus. No one asks me to provide a CDC-issued vax card to prove that I am already inoculated against Hep B, they simply pull a laboratory blood test on each such instance, and it returns a result, each time, indicating that I have acquired viral immunity from Hep B (which lasts a lifetime).
When this type of ‘compulsory vaccination of the immune’ scheme eventually gets its day in court, it should be argued/judged in part on past practices in similar medical circumstances. Pretending that natural or post-infection immunity does not exist will not work for them, and ‘past practices’ are also against them, as demonstrated in my personal viral example above – forcing people to get an experimental injection at penalty of job / income loss, when immune, does not meet the basic standards of medical ethics anymore than it would if I was forced to accept a Hep B vaccination every time that I took a new job, despite blood testing showing full immunity.
I suspect that the casting of doubts on Covid diagnostic testing reliability could be a throw-away tactic designed to support a claim that, since no one can allegedly tell who has had Covid, everyone still needs to take the experimental injection due to the new-found, o-so unfortunate, unreliability of testing. There is genuine concern over where the diagnostic cutoff cycle count should be, but that does not make PCR or other testing processes useless or even unreliable in more conservative cycle count confidence intervals.
If you notice in the CDC link to FDA approved tests,under ‘Serology/Antibody and Other Adaptive Immune Response Tests’ (the section relating to antibodies-T/B cell immunity testing) it is little more that templates for potential test developers. They lose nothing by tossing out the PCR diagnostic test because a lot of other options are available, but gain a claim that all the previous testing for those who claim acquired immunity is now unreliable and it hopefully becomes tainted when used by plaintiffs fighting injection mandates on the grounds of prior infection/recovery..
The blunt object, last-ditch weapon in the arsenal of the vaccine mandaters is thus to deny that historical testing works, and thus the only option is to vaccinate everyone with their sacred injections. For those of us who are generally honest, it is hard to interdict the thought processes of international criminals involved in mass deaths across the planet, but “beware of stranger bearing gifts” seems pertinent here..
No one should be forced to receive any medical intervention they don’t want to take, period, full stop. We should not need a test to see if we are immune to any virus because it’s non of anyone’s business. At some point so done decided that a vaxxine was the be all end all to disease and these poisons have cause many people to suffer adverse reactions and death. No vaxxine mandates for anything ever.
Center for Disinformation and Coercion
Its actually hard to discern on which counts they are lying and on which counts they are simply too incompetent to understand how inaccurate they are. I think that it is largely a combination of ‘incompetent liars’, who know that those pointing out the falsehoods are banned from all channels of mass media to counter the falsehoods, meaning they don’t need to be accurate, since it will go unchallenged.
This (non)Study from Kentucky is in high rotation right now as a Wallensky life-preserver –
It claims that among Kentuckians tested for Covid from March–December 2020, many more develop reinfection from Covid that the vaxxed. Wallensky is quoted –
“This study shows you are twice as likely to get infected again if you are unvaccinated,” Dr. Rochelle Walensky, the director of the CDC, said in a statement.”
The problem is, the SAME NAAD/PCR testing that her OWN agency just issued a notice that it was going to withdraw as unreliable is used to substantiate these results. The so-called study does not mention the cycle count used on these people individually, which can at higher counts give you ANY positive result that you want.
The cycle count for testing vaxxed and unvaxxed had been set at different cycle count confidence intervals back when the CDC first realized that the experimental injections could not stop infection / transmission (they tried to conceal this by making it easier to diagnose an infected status in non-vaxxed and much harder to diagnose in the vaxxed), meaning its likely that this comparison is rigged.
When you go to the table of initial claimed infection dates,.. the vast majority are all claimed infected in Nov/Dec 2020 (70%) and then reinfected in May/June 2021, Those with the oldest infections (and suggested faded / lesser immunity) are ACTUALLY the most protected, rubbishing the assertion of fading immunity. Its more likely that in Oct/Nov/Dec 2020 they were using a higher cycle count to diagnose infected status, meaning they increased the false positives in those they knew where not vaxxed.
As pertains to this same non-study, a quote from “Sabra Klein, a virologist at Johns Hopkins University” , accurately states –
“Instead of going after different parts of the virus called antigens, as the immune system does naturally, she said the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines ONLY [MY EMPHASIS ADDED] target the spike protein, which is vital for invading cells. Getting vaccinated after having COVID gives someone a “strong, lasting immunity boost,” according to Klein.”
Klein is totally correct in the first sentence, although few Americans realize this due to misinformation – which is that Covid ‘vaccines’ have ZERO ability to target or immunize against the viral payload, and can do nothing in the best-case scenario but generate spike protein in an effort to block the breaching mechanism.. In the second sentence she appears to me to pretend that this is a virtue or ‘strength’ of the vaccine, which is nonsensical. Once the spike mutates, the vaxxed have zero protection, unlike the naturally recovered, who are much better protected, because they not only generate immune defense against the Spike but also against the viral payload.
I think that when facing deliberate deception, we have to realize that a lot of otherwise good people are buying into this because they have been frightened and want to trust those in charge who promise that they know what to do –
“She said her father, who was a clinical psychologist, received the COVID-19 vaccine in January, but suddenly felt sick a few months later… She believes that COVID-positive, unvaccinated person in her father’s office exposed him to the virus.”
Even when the vaccine failed her, and her loved one died, this woman did not blame the false information about spike protein efficacy that the CDC/NIH peddled, she did not take note of the fact that they have known for a long time now that the vax cannot stop infection/transmission and instructed the vaxxed NOT to get tested in response – true believers can be led anywhere, because its more comfortable to have faith in false claims than to realize that those promising to know what to do are incompentent and/or lying, and in some cases seeking to hide their own potential for complicity in this event.
Rather die from the fake man made disease than die from the fake man made cure.