March 14, 2021 (updated April 5, 2021)
UPDATED April 5, 2021 – Mary Voll has been cyberstalking our Editor-in-Chief since mid-March.
Just don’t understand why this woman will not move on in life. She has been stalking other websites owned by The COVID Blog Editor-in-Chief for over three weeks. She does it from four different IP addresses: 184.108.40.206, 220.127.116.11, 18.104.22.168 and 22.214.171.124.
Our analytics software has logged her every move, which has amounted to over 80 clicks and over 15 hours of browsing time. Though the traffic is appreciated, this amounts to cyberstalking from someone who is obviously not stable.
Florida’s cyberstalking law is enumerated at §784.048(d) Fla. Stat. We are forwarding the visitor logs to the Altamonte Springs Police Department.
UPDATED March 29, 2021 – Mary Voll playing with fire and the First Amendment
Our friends over at Health Impact News reported that Mary Voll attempted to get their website taken offline with a frivolous DMCA takedown complaint. They re-posted our story about the Voll’s on March 15. Health Impact News lost nine hours of web traffic after Amazon temporarily took their sites down. Mr. Brian Shilhavy, editor of Health Impact News, now has colorable claims for a potential lawsuit against the Voll’s for reporting a frivolous DMCA violation that caused economic loss.
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held in 2015 that “parties must individually consider whether a work is a fair use before representing that the work is infringing in a takedown notice.” Lenz v. Universal Music Corp., 801 F.3d 1126 (9th Cir. 2015).
First, the Facebook screenshots are not copyrighted despite the Voll’s filing for a copyright on March 14. The process takes weeks and is highly unlikely to be successful because screenshots cannot be copyrighted. Second, the Voll’s deliberately and maliciously failed to consider fair use before requesting the DMCA takedown. Mr. Shilhavy, Health Impact News and the other websites on the network have prima facie causes of action against the Voll’s if they choose to pursue them.
We hope the Voll’s can find peace somehow. Frivolous DMCA takedowns are only going to lead to more turmoil for the family and land them in federal court. The feelings are understandable. But the First Amendment is inalienable.
UPDATED MARCH 28, 2021 – Voll’s apply to copyright screenshots
It appears Mary Voll and Jake Voll have filed some sort of copyright application for Facebook screenshots. The average copyright online application takes three months to process, thus there is still no “copyright” at this time. Despite the effort, and again, even if this long-shot application is approved, the Fair Use Doctrine, enumerated in the Copyright Act of 1976, as Pub. L. No. 94-553, 90 Stat. 2541, 17 U.S. Code § 107, applies to our article.
The screenshots in this article are “for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, [and] is not an infringement of copyright.” Id. See the link in the subsequent update for more information. Further, the content contained in this article is screenshots from Facebook. A New York federal judge ruled in 2019 that screenshots of social media posts fall under the fair use doctrine.
“Even drawing all reasonable inferences in Plaintiff’s favor, it is evident…that Defendant’s use [of a screenshot] was fair as a matter of law. Defendant’s use was transformative, its use was reasonable in light of that end, the work was already published, and there is no plausible risk to any market for licensing of the original work. This is sufficient to make out an affirmative defense of fair use at the motion to dismiss stage.” Yang v. Mic Network, Inc., 405 F. Supp. 3d 537 – Dist. Court, SD New York 2019.
Any malicious, bad faith and/or frivolous attempts to disrupt our website in any way will result in litigation not only against Stone Eagle IP Holdings, but also those they represent.
UPDATE MARCH 17, 2021 – OUR EDITOR-IN-CHIEF WROTE AN EDITORIAL IN RESPONSE TO SOME OF THE THREATS AND HATE MAIL AS A RESULT OF THIS POST.
ALTAMONTE SPRINGS, FLORIDA — We want to preface this article with the fact that we only publish these stories to bring awareness to the situation surrounding COVID-19 experimental shots. These stories are not meant to disrespect families or individuals. But social media posts are public, primary sources for journalists. The social media “vaccine photo phenomenon” is a trend in 2021. We have the responsibility to report. Now on to the story.
Mrs. Mary Pat Voll is a pediatric nurse in Altamonte Springs, Florida, according to her Facebook page. She posted a photo of herself holding a vaccine card, with the caption “pregnant and vaccinated” on February 22.
She wrote that she considered all factual information and weeded out “conspiracy” before getting the first and second shots. Mrs. Voll was 21 weeks pregnant at the time. Her baby was stillborn eight days later, according to a subsequent Facebook post.
Husband Jake Voll Facebook post
Mr. Jake Voll provided further information on the unfortunate event yesterday on Facebook. Jake said any relationship between the stillbirth and mRNA shots are “post hoc fallacy.”
Little Ellie died from “a marginal cord insertion complicated by placenta previa resulting in fetal vascular malperfusion,” according to Mr. Voll. Marginal cord insertion is a pregnancy complication when the baby’s umbilical cord attaches itself to the wrong part of the placenta. Placenta previa is a further complication when the placenta partially or completely covers the cervix.
Fetal vascular malperfusion is yet another complication that obstructs blood flow to the fetus. Preterm birth, fetal mortality due to excessive bleeding, and stillbirths are some of the results of this condition. Emergency C-sections are required to potentially save the baby.
Syncytin-1 and pregnancy
Syncytin-1 is a protein essential to both placental development and function. Dr. Michael Yeadon is the former Vice President and Chief Scientific Officer of Pfizer. Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg is a German physician and epidemiologist. They filed a petition with the European Medicines Agency on December 1, 2020. It asked the agency to stay Phase III clinical trials of the Pfizer BNT162b mRNA shot and all other trials for experimental shots. The doctors said the study designs for said shots must be amended to conform with several requests that ensure integrity and safety.
The petition speaks about Syncytin-1 and pregnancy as one of the doctors’ primary concerns about the experimental shots.
Several vaccine candidates are expected to induce the formation of humoral antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. Syncytin-1…is responsible for the development of a placenta in mammals and humans and is therefore an essential prerequisite for a successful pregnancy, [and] is also found in homologous form in the spike proteins of SARS viruses. There is no indication whether antibodies against spike proteins of SARS viruses would also act like anti-Syncytin-1 antibodies. However, if this were to be the case this would then also prevent the formation of a placenta which would result in vaccinated women essentially becoming infertile. To my knowledge, Pfizer/BioNTech has yet to release any samples of written materials provided to patients, so it is unclear what, if any, information regarding (potential) fertility-specific risks caused by antibodies is included.
Read the full petition here. Dr. Yeadon and Dr. Wodarg were apparently on to something. Mrs. Voll gave no indication of health issues or pregnancy complications prior to the shots. She received the Pfizer or Moderna mRNA shot because those were the only two available in the USA at the time of her shot.
Pregnant and child-bearing women should not take these shots
Pfizer’s own fact sheet for emergency use authorization says that there is not enough evidence to advise pregnant and child-bearing women on getting the experimental mRNA shots.
Pfizer also says in its own clinical trial reports that women who are pregnant or wish to become pregnant should not take the shots (page 37-38: Exclusion Criteria). We covered the story of Dr. Sara Beltrán Ponce last month. She had a miscarriage days after receiving an mRNA shot.
There is no rational, intelligent reason for pregnant women or those wishing to become pregnant to take these shots. We hope Mr. and Mrs. Voll find peace somehow, someway. But at least their story may help someone else along the way.
Contact COVID Legal USA today if you are fighting against mandatory vaccines for employment. We also assist people with pro se representation related to other COVID mandates and restrictions. Follow us on Telegram.